What The Pro-Life Movement Misses

February 2, 2026 at 2:48 pm, No comments

Something I always thought was the ultimate goal of the pro-life movement was to abolish abortion, meaning criminalizing abortion as it is murder, which all who are against abortion state. But the Holy Spirit has convicted me and shown me something crucial that is missing from the mainstream pro-life movement: treating the crime of murdering an innocent human being in the womb as what it is, a crime. I believe this is a fundamental puzzle piece that the movement misses, which is making the fight against abortion harder.

If it is murder, it is a crime.

What do we do with this?

73 million induced abortions occur worldwide each year, hence around 200,000 abortions per day.

Exodus 23 — ‘’ do not put an innocent or honest person to death’’

‘’We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men and women are created equal.’’
— Elizabeth Cady Stanton, an abolitionist

I’m aware that this is a controversial topic in the pro-life movement, but I believe with my heart that the enemy, the father of lies and destroyer of life, has created this quarrel on purpose.

I assume that the majority of my readers will start reading this by disagreeing with me, but we must encourage dialogue with each other. I hope both sides of the conversation will always do that. It is so tempting for us to go into defensive mode, and that most likely won’t produce any fruit.

DO WE WANT TO SEE THE TOTAL END OF ABORTION OR NOT?

I have heard the chants about wanting equal justice under the law for all humans, beginning in the womb; however, the same individuals reject any abolition bill of abortion proposed. This breaks the foundation of being anti-abortion and does not cut to the very root of the problem. (Yes, you can say you are pro-life and be an abolitionist of abortion, but I’m referring to the pro-life movement with my argument.)

There have been compromises.

From the pro-life establishment movement.

Recently, President Donald Trump has called for Republicans to be more flexible with the Hyde deal, which prevents money from being used to nurture the abortion industry. Rightly, the pro-life movement has condemned this and is trying to take action to prevent this. The president of the United States and his administration have approved a cheaper version of the abortion pill and called for lower costs for IVF. And it was discovered that the Trump administration began secretly partially funding Planned Parenthood, stepping down from their previous positions on the matter.

The pro-life movement is against this because it is compromising. But when there has been a push in the United States to immediately end all abortions, it has, with great effort, killed the bills that promoted it. That’s also a compromise.

In April 2022, the Abolition of Abortion in Louisiana Act passed through the Louisiana House Criminal Justice Committee by a 7–2 vote. But the vast majority of the pro-life leaders actively oppose legislation to abolish abortion. 76 pro-life groups signed an open letter that killed the Abolition of Abortion in Louisiana Act. Or when National Right to Life VP Tony Lauinger was behind legislation to add rape and incest exceptions for abortion into Oklahoma State law. Every year, since 2016, they have killed the bill to abolish abortion at the Oklahoma Capitol.

‘’Turning women who have abortions into criminals is not the way… We ask you to continue to act with love and compassion toward abortion-vulnerable women. We urge you to reject any measure that seeks to criminalize women who have abortions.”

And it is in Oklahoma’s statutes: ‘’No criminal penalty may be assessed against the pregnant woman upon whom the abortion is performed… 63 O.S. § 1–750(B)

Abortion is the act of taking an innocent life in the womb intentionally. Within the movement, it is correctly told countless times. But not fully treated as such. It is a slippery slope.

We should not regulate abortion, but abolish it. That’s how we can also make abortion unthinkable. That’s how slavery ended, not just through law, but in the hearts of the people in countries like the United States of America and Great Britain. It was not through regulation.

THE GOSPEL & JUSTICE FOR THE VICTIM

Another difference between the mainstream movement against abortion and the abolitionists is the Gospel. One does not centralize it, other does. As Christians, what can truly solve the malign forces of the culture of death? The Gospel of the Kingdom of Jesus Christ. The only One who can restore, forgive, and redeem the wounds of this tragedy for the babies, mothers, and fathers. We cannot leave Christ out of the fight. We must bring the light, hope, and solution into this. And if you are a Christian, you know the Truth; it is our duty to proclaim it.

It is important to remember, as Christians, that our Lord is a just God. He is the judge. Yes, merciful, yes, forgiving, but also just. The way He saved us from eternal death was through a just measure. We must establish justice, too. ‘’Thy Kingdom come, Thy will be done, on Earth as it is in Heaven…’’

Being an abolitionist on abortion includes calling for parents involved in abortion, the ones working in the industry, to repentance and not condemn their hearts. And our Churches must be safe havens for families. We all must step up.

And I understand that this position might appear superficially as unmerciful and uncompassionate, but God also wants us to be righteous and just. And there can be, and should be, mercy while establishing justice at the same time.

‘’Woe to you Pharisees, because you give God a tenth of your mint, rue, and all other kinds of garden herbs, but you neglect justice and the love of God. You should have practiced the latter without leaving the former undone.’’ — Luke 11:42

But we must also be just fully, not partially. Nitpicking when to practice full justice isn’t real justice.

Proverbs 24 — o show partiality in judging is not good:
Whoever says to the guilty, “You are innocent,”
will be cursed by peoples and denounced by nations.
But it will go well with those who convict the guilty,
and rich blessing will come on them.

And if one opposes this, that mothers should escape any legal consequences of abortion, one should be against it when mothers murder their children outside of the womb. But that is not rejected by the same individuals who reject the abolitionist movement of abortion. What changes? One baby is outside of the womb, the other one isn’t. Isn’t that the same argument that pro-abortionists make to justify the act of abortion?

Isaiah 1:16–17 — Wash and make yourselves clean.
Take your evil deeds out of my sight;
stop doing wrong.
Learn to do right; seek justice.
Defend the oppressed.
Take up the cause of the fatherless;
plead the case of the widow

Last year, a father from Texas was charged with capital murder after he ordered abortion pills via mail and put them into the drink of the mother, and unfortunately, the baby died. Mason Herring told his wife, Catherine Herring, that her pregnancy “would ruin his plans and make him look like a jerk.” And the charges are just, because that is murder of a human being and his own child. He does not get a pass because he was the father of the child. He was sentenced to 6 months in prison, which, in my opinion, is not just in contrast with the severity of the crime! In the mother’s own words: “I do not believe that 180 days is justice for attempting to kill your child seven separate times,” Harris County District Court Judge Andrea Ball also gave him a 10-year probation.

And the arrest of the father was justly supported by the pro-life movement. But why, when the mother consciously chooses to order the abortion pills and takes them, killing the child, why does the ethical aspect of it change all of a sudden?

Abolitionist activist James Silberman met with the office of Ohio State Senator Andrew Brenner in April 2019. James explained to Brenner’s aide the importance of introducing and passing a bill that nullifies Roe and treats abortion like murder from the moment of conception. At the end of James’ presentation, Brenner’s aide said, “This was very interesting, but it’s Senator Brenner’s personal religious conviction that life begins at a heartbeat.” He concluded with this statement from the Heartbeat Bill, which had just passed in Ohio a few months earlier.

(These informations are found on the Abolitionists Rising Website)

Abolitionists Rising’s T. Russell Hunter was ministering outside an abortion facility in Norman, OK, in 2016. A young mother whom Russell was pleading with not to have the abortion told him, “It’s okay. My baby won’t even feel any pain.” She has likely concluded this position from the Pro-Life Movement and the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which highlights pain as the reason abortion should be illegal. But we know this is incorrect, but it is bringing confusion and not the whole truth on the matter. But this is and will cost more lives if we continue this way.

In Kansas, a mother, Melinda Spencer, was charged with first-degree fetal (‘little human’ in Latin) homicide using an abortion pill and burying the baby in a shallow grave near her home. Melinda admitted this on December 31st:

“[Spencer] reported to United Clinics that she aborted her own baby within the last few days with medicine that she ordered off the internet. She told them that she buried the remains on the property. Kentucky State Police was then contacted.”
“She gave a description of the grave and a search warrant was obtained. During a search of the property a shallow grave was located where [she] said it would be. Located in this shallow grave was a white plastic grocery bag. Inside that grocery bag was a light bulb box wrapped in Christmas Wrapping Paper. Inside the box was a white rag with a small male corpse wrapped up inside it. The Wolf County Coroner took the corpse into his possession. Autopsy has been scheduled.”

She was also charged with the abuse of a corpse and tampering with physical evidence. Both are Class D felonies. But recently, this charge was dropped.

Why? Commonwealth’s Attorney Miranda King, who handles cases in Breathitt, Powell, and Wolfe counties, cited a Kentucky statute that ensures women are not prosecuted regarding the deaths of their preborn children.

Police spoke with her at Clark Regional Medical Center, where she admitted to having taken the abortion drugs off the internet. She said the baby (notice that she is aware that it was a human being inside her womb) was not her boyfriend’s, and she did not want him to find out she was pregnant with another man’s baby. She took the drugs on 12/26 and delivered the baby the next day. This is, in fact, a premeditated murder.

In South Korea, in 2024, a mother who aborted her baby in the 9th month, as her nurse told her multiple times that she would be murdering a baby, a human being, went with it with her doctor, who is charged with murder. It is also believed that the baby was born alive and left to die, as this has occurred in the West as well, the Korea Times reports:

‘’Judge Park Jeong-ho at the Seoul Central District Court issued arrest warrants on Saturday for the surgeon, identified only by his last name Shim, and the clinic’s head, surnamed Yoon, over their alleged roles in the death of a baby believed to have been born alive and then left to die through willful neglect.’’

The Korean Medical Association released a statement:

“A fetus at 36 weeks of pregnancy is a baby who could survive well if born, and terminating a pregnancy at this stage is tantamount to murder.”

The investigators “also found that hundreds of other pregnant women had undergone abortion procedures at the same clinic.”

The mother of the child also released a YouTube video ‘documenting’ her having aborted a 36-week-old baby…her baby. In South Korea, this crime would have led to a few years in prison, but it has been overturned in recent years.

For there not be any legal consequences for abortion is, in a sense, dehumanizing the baby in the womb. Because if we say not to apply the charges, we would, if an infant outside the womb were murdered, we are essentially stating there is something less human, as the full equal protection of all people doesn’t apply to them.

Romans 3:8 — Why not say — as some slanderously claim that we say — “Let us do evil that good may result”? Their condemnation is just!

Yes, abortion is not likely to be abolished overnight, but we ought consistently call for total and immediate abolition while working diligently to reduce the number of abortions by practicing moral suasion and assistance for as long as it takes, until total abolition is accomplished. But if in the very anti-abortion fight, leaders are opposing it and fighting not to pass the bill, we are delaying what we say we fight so badly for. We want abortion to end, because human beings are being murdered through it. The laws against murder should be applied equally to all people.

Criminalizing abortion is not about putting ‘’women in jail’’ but establishing justice when this crime occurs. The guilty is the abortionist. Be it the mother, the father, the doctors, or an outsider who forces the mother, etc.

We should reach out to mothers in difficulty and help them with compassion to choose life. We shouldn’t want to have mothers in such a situation anymore. Create more safe Havens, as a matter of fact, a first baby was put in a safe haven baby box in Texas just recently, in late December of 2025. Only in 2023 did lawmakers approve the use of newborn safety devices, often referred to as “baby boxes,” for anonymous surrender. The baby is healthy and will be put up for adoption, which in the United States alone is estimated to have around 2 million parents waiting on the adoption list.

Photo from: KLBK Meteorologist Jacob Riley

If we are clear in law what abortion does, and hence starting to shape how we approach abortion itself, like today with slavery, it truly becomes unthinkable, and women won’t even desire to seek an abortion. Because they would know 100% that it is a human being, they wouldn’t be misinformed or gaslighted to believe it’s just a ‘’clump of cells.’’ We must love them both. We don’t want mothers and fathers to carry such a cross and grief. This can truly become unthinkable, but we need to all work together.

The real tragedy and problem is not that there wouldn’t be legal and ‘’safe’’ abortions, but that mothers would choose and even risk their lives to take the life of their child. That’s the brokenness, not the unavailability of abortion. And in my opinion, abortion clinics and mega industries (ex. Planned Parenthood) should be put on trial, not just defunded.

“When you have to be the person signing off on 500 bodies a week to be cremated with trash from hospitals, you understand that what you have been selling has never been freedom — not for the mother and not for the child,” said Mayra Rodriguez, a former Planned Parenthood staffer.
“What you have been selling, it’s pain and darkness, and it’s bloody. And it’s all about money.”

We can end this. And it will.

And let’s finance even more safe housing for mothers in danger or in great difficulty, safe havens, and pregnancy centers that truly help. Almost every mother who has aborted her child has regretted doing it. But never have I personally heard a mother who kept her child or gave her child away to adoption regretted that decision, despite all the hardships she might have gone through.

But will there still be someone who will illegally abort their baby? Unfortunately. But other horrendous crimes that are illegal and we morally reject still occur, but we don’t make them legal simply because there are people who break the law; rather, we bring them to trial. And what is extremely important is that the hearts of the majority of people continue to reject that crime. There will always be evil done, but as a society and as Christians, we must try to do our best to limit it as much as possible and take the right position on the matter.

IMMEDIATE IS THE WAY, NOT GRADUAL

Slavery is used as a comparison with abortion, even within the pro-life movement, with the point that in both cases there is this feeling of having a ‘’right’’ over the autonomy of the other; the slave, the unborn in the womb. But as mentioned before, how was this evil truly defeated after 400 years in the U.S., for example? Through abolitionists.

A slavery abolitionist, Elizabeth Heyrick, explains the following very well. It is lengthy, but important to ponder on:

“The slave holder knew very well that his prey would be secure, so long as the abolitionists could be cajoled into a demand for gradual instead of immediate abolition. He knew very well, that the contemplation of a gradual emancipation would beget a gradual indifference to emancipation itself. He knew very well, that even the wise and the good, may, by habit and familiarity, be brought to endure and tolerate almost anything.

He knew very well that the faithful delineation of the horrors of West Indian slavery, would produce such a general insurrection of sympathetic and indignant feeling; such abhorrence of the oppressor, such compassion for the oppressed, as must soon have been fatal to the whole system… Our example might have spread from kingdom to kingdom, from continent to continent, and the slave trade, and slavery, might by this time, have been abolished all the world over: ‘A sacrifice of a sweet savour,’ might have ascended to the Great Parent of the Universe, ‘His kingdom might have come, and his will (thus far) have been done on earth, as it is in Heaven.’

But this GRADUAL ABOLITION, has been the grand marplot of human virtue and happiness; the very masterpiece of satanic policy. By converting the cry for immediate, into gradual emancipation, the prince of slave holders, ‘transformed himself, with astonishing dexterity, into an angel of light,’ and thereby ‘deceived the very elect.’

He saw very clearly, that if public justice and humanity, especially, if Christian justice and humanity, could be brought to demand only a gradual extermination of the enormities of the slave system; if they could be brought to acquiesce, but for one year, or for one month, in the slavery of our African brother, in robbing him of all the rights of humanity, and degrading him to a level with the brutes; that then, they could imperceptibly be brought to acquiesce in all this for an unlimited duration….’’

Moses was also an abolitionist. Pharaoh offered him many deals, many compromises on his behalf. He offered to let some of the Hebrews go, he offered to let the Hebrews go for a certain amount of time, and offered to let all the Hebrews go free permanently, so long as they left their animals. But Moses replied, “Not a hoof shall be left behind” (Exodus 10:24–26).

Other abolitionists, such as William Wilberforce (who was in the movement to abolish the Atlantic slave trade and played a crucial role in the passage of the Slave Trade Act of 1807 and the Slavery Abolition Act of 1833) and Abraham Lincoln’s speeches, are the same cries we should all be shouting.

In Leviticus 19:15, God commands Israel’s judges, “You shall do no injustice in court. You shall not be partial to the poor or defer to the great, but in righteousness shall you judge your neighbor.”

Equal justice is the fulfillment of this principle that God commands us to live by.

The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, for instance, reads, ‘’nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” This law prohibits any state from allowing crimes like homicide to be committed against preborn human beings, and further prohibits states from treating preborn children differently under the law, as Abolitionists Rising reminds us.

There can never be a compromise with the crime of murder. And abortion is included in that list. Elizabeth Heyrick, a British abolitionist of slavery, said:

‘’On this great question, the spirit of accommodation and conciliation has been a spirit of delusion. The abolitionists have lost, rather than gained ground by it; their cause has been weakened, instead of strengthened. The great interests of truth and justice are betrayed, rather than supported, by all softening, qualifying concessions. Every iota which is yielded of their rightful claims, impairs the conviction of their rectitude, and, consequently, weakens their success.’’

Compromising with evil, like slavery, does undermine the power that the anti-slavery stance is all about, for instance. Hence, making the abolition of an evil more difficult. And I’m unfortunately seeing this happen to some degree within the pro-life movement, as I have cited a few examples throughout this article.

Not merciful?

Something I come across when abolitionists discuss this matter with a pro-lifer who rejects the abolition of abortion, we are accused of not being merciful towards the mother, and especially if we are Christians, we are not obeying Christ by wanting to abolish abortion. I understand this point of view. I myself held it. I get it, it’s a hard pill to swallow in our times. But we tend to put our emotions in charge of morality nowadays. And THAT can become dangerous.

In justice, mercy is met. Our Lord Jesus Christ said to visit prisoners, and we know how many priests go to prison and those on death row to bring God’s mercy, love, hope, and salvation to these individuals. As Christians, we cannot reject the position of putting people who commit crimes in prisons, but we also bring hope to them.

One saying that criminals should face prison time does not mean that we are condemning them and shutting the door of Christ in their faces. But because we serve a just God as well. We also love the people who were victims of such crimes, such as murder, trafficking, rape, and being stolen from, etc. Their rights and dignity were violated, and consequences must be met. Sometimes it appears to me that compassion has become one-sided, and usually with the criminal, with the cases of Iryna Zarutska, Austin Metcalf, Luigi Mangione (who murdered Brian Thompson, the CEO of UnitedHealthcare), Tyler Robinson (Charlie Kirk’s assassin), and, unfortunately, many more.

In California, for example, it is illegal to harass, harm, or collect sea turtles and their eggs (because they admit that a fertilized turtle egg is a living turtle, developing, but deny this scientific fact about human beings) under the Endangered Species Act (which I don’t personally oppose). Violating these laws can lead to severe penalties, including fines and imprisonment! But guess what is legal? Abortion is legal in California up to the point of fetal viability.

The state’s highest court recognized abortion rights under the California Constitution in 1969, four years before Roe. State law. In November 2022, Prop 1 passed, which explicitly added abortion and contraception rights to the state constitution!

What hypocrisy! We are ready to imprison the individual who harms turtle eggs, but find it immoral if it were to apply to human beings (our own species) in the womb.

If we stand with the position that abortion should not be criminalized, knowing it is taking the life of an innocent human being, holding the position that human life begins at conception, are we seriously considering that, for example, theft is a graver sin and crime to go to prison for, but murdering a child in the womb is not?

Mercy does not outweigh justice. We have to bring them both.

Amos 5:15 — Hate evil, love good;
maintain justice in the courts

Psalm 82:3: ‘’Provide justice for the needy and the fatherless (the unwanted baby is fatherless, we ought to protect); uphold the rights of the oppressed and the destitute.’’

How many times have I read and heard of countless powerful testimonies of murderers in prison who were transformed by Christ, born into a new life, even more zealous Christians than those out of prison? They met Christ, they were cleansed and redeemed, and they have changed hearts. They love God and their neighbour.

But not once, those in prison who follow Him, know Him, say that they did not deserve to be serving their sentences for the crimes they committed, but saw it rather as an instrument that can bring them to the only way there is, Christ. Thousands of prisoners are baptised yearly in all parts of the world. God is there. He can meet us in our darkest valley and save us.

Abortion is wrong because every human, at the moment of conception (which science confirms — 96% biologists affirm this), has been created in the image of God. Jesus came here to save us through the womb of a Virgin! It is an attack on Christ Himself. He did say whatever we do to the smallest of ours, we do to Him. And that goes also for the wrong we do to our neighbours.

THE GOSPEL IS NECESSARY FOR THE FIGHT AGAINST ABORTION

Another criticism I have of the mainstream pro-life movement is the fact that the Gospel is not at the center. We can truly defeat the culture of death by being with Christ and bringing complete healing to this wound in our culture. We have to abolish the desire for death in the hearts of people, not only through law. And doctors must be healers, not murderers. That can truly be healed through entering the only physician who can heal, Jesus. Our Saviour said firstly in His ministry to repent. That’s the message we must send too, as His followers.

A slavery abolitionist, William Lloyd Garrison, said very well, “My fanaticism is to make Christianity the enemy of all that is sinful.” That should be our focus also as Christians.

And the Catechism of the Catholic Church is clear as day on the matter:

2270 Human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the moment of conception. From the first moment of his existence, a human being must be recognized as having the rights of a person — among which is the inviolable right of every innocent being to life. [Cf. CDF, Donum vitae I, 1] [1703, 357]
2271 Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil of every procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable. Direct abortion, that is to say, abortion willed either as an end or a means, is gravely contrary to the moral law:

You shall not kill the embryo by abortion and shall not cause the newborn to perish. [Didache 2, 2: SCh 248, 148; cf. Ep. Barnabae 19, 5: PG 2, 777; Ad Diognetum 5, 6: PG 2, 1173; Tertullian, Apol. 9: PL 1, 319–320]

God, the Lord of life, has entrusted to men the noble mission of safeguarding life, and men must carry it out in a manner worthy of themselves. Life must be protected with the utmost care from the moment of conception: abortion and infanticide are abominable crimes. [GS 51 § 3]

Then, how can we accomplish what we are fighting for in such secular societies? How to talk about this with a non-believer in Christ?

The answer is, first and foremost, faith. All is possible with God. Remember Abraham. Remember Gideon. Remember Moses. Remember David and Goliath. Remember Esther. Remember the Virgin Mary at the Annunciation. Remember Christ scourged, crucified, and resurrected.

Abraham Lincoln, who signed the Emancipation Proclamation, which declared the freedom of enslaved people in the Confederate states, on January 1, 1863, which proclamation was a significant step towards the eventual abolition of slavery in the United States, said when asked if God was on his side:

“Sir, my concern is not whether God is on our side; my greatest concern is to be on God’s side, for God is always right.”

Will it be even more challenging to confront these heavy atheistic cultures by bringing the Gospel to the center of our fight? Probably. But again, is anything too hard for our amazing God?

I would argue that it would strengthen our fight because putting God in the discussions will demonstrate why abortion is objectively wrong. There are secular, atheistic/agnostic pro-lifers, and that’s awesome.

But if you hold your atheistic beliefs and you are against abortion, rightly so, how do you truly know that it is objectively wrong? Science? Well, someone else could argue that the value of a human being relies on having our souls, not merely being physically a human being developing in the womb. Can we prove scientifically in a lab the exact moment when one receive his soul? What makes a human being so precious? They could insist that when brain waves and heartbeat are detected, that’s when the human soul comes. For instance, in Islam, it is believed that the human soul is breathed into the body at around 120 days from conception.

“Each one of you is constituted in the womb of the mother for forty days, and then he becomes a clot of thick blood for a similar period, and then a piece of flesh for a similar period.
Then Allah sends an angel who is ordered to write four things. He is ordered to write down his deeds, his livelihood, his (date of) death, and whether he will be blessed or wretched (in religion). Then the soul is breathed into him…” (Sahih al-Bukhari no: 3036).

And Imam Ibn Abidin states:

“The soul enters the foetus at 120 days (4 months), as established by the Hadith.” (Radd al-Muhtar ala Durr al-Mukhtar 1/202)

With this belief, it is easy to morally justify aborting a baby before the 4th month.

This is why the Bible is essential in the fight against the culture of death.

But there is a deeper conversation to be had, because being a human existence is more than our physicality. Our current culture is hyper-fixated on matter alone, echoing gnosticism.

Hence, the concern is that leaving God (especially the God of the Bible) out of the discussion makes it very tempting to fall into the pro-abortion position or be flexible about it. I have heard some ‘’pro-lifers’’ say that abortion should be permitted in the cases of rape and incest.

What makes us valuable at the moment of conception is the One who crafted us in our precious mother’s womb. Because of our purpose. Because God created us out of His love and goodness. That’s why we are good, because our Creator is goodness and love itself. That’s why being merely human is so precious. That’s why we ought to protect them, even when the baby looks just like a ‘clump of cells.’

Lennart Nilsson’s photos were published in Life magazine (April 30, 1965)

That’s why we fight for the dignity of the embryos frozen because of IVF. Or those babies who fell victim to fetal research. (In a recent press release, the NIH announced the policy change. To ban “the NIH Intramural Research Program and all NIH-supported extramural research, including grants, cooperative agreements, other transaction awards, and research and development contracts.”)

— To read more, click here. I also wrote a detailed article on this topic; click here!)

But if you don’t believe in God, where is the moral foundation truly? It is actually harder to argue the value of being a human without God.

We must rely on God’s Word and not on worldly strategies.

Isaiah 10

‘’Woe to those who make unjust laws,
to those who issue oppressive decrees,
to deprive the poor of their rights
and withhold justice from the oppressed of my people,
making widows their prey
and robbing the fatherless.
What will you do on the day of reckoning’’

CONCLUSION

(Graphic image below)

I’m an abortion abolitionist.

And I believe that every fighter against it should call themselves that, too, and join the movement and demand the abolition of abortion, not regulation. I pray and hope that you will seriously consider this in your heart if you disagree with me and the abolitionist movement altogether. It is a discussion we must have within the anti-abortion movement.

Lives relying on it. And we must keep going every day and keep praying for everyone involved in this tragedy.